Yancin taro
'Yancin taro na lumana, wani lokaci ana amfani da shi tare da 'yancin haɗin gwiwa, shine haƙƙin mutum ɗaya ko ikon mutane don haɗuwa tare da bayyanawa, haɓaka, bi, da kare ra'ayoyinsu na gamayya ko gamayya. [2] An kuma amince da 'yancin yin tarayya a matsayin 'yancin ɗan adam, 'yancin siyasa da 'yancin ɗan adam .
Ƴancin Yin Taro | |
---|---|
Bayanai | |
Ƙaramin ɓangare na | Ƴancin Jama'a |
Za a iya amfani da sharuɗɗan ƴancin taro da ƴancin ƙungiyoyi don bambance tsakanin 'yancin yin taro a wuraren jama'a da 'yancin shiga ƙungiya. Ana amfani da 'yancin yin taro sau da yawa a cikin mahallin ' yancin yin zanga-zanga, yayin da ake amfani da 'yancin yin tarayya a cikin mahallin 'yancin aiki kuma a cikin Kundin Tsarin Mulki na Amurka ana fassara shi da ma'anar 'yancin yin taro da 'yancin shiga wata ƙungiya. ƙungiya. [3]
Kayan aikin kare hakkin dan adam
gyara sasheAn haɗa ’yancin yin taro a cikin, da sauransu, waɗannan kayan aikin haƙƙin ɗan adam:
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights – Article 20.
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Article 21
- European Convention on Human Rights – Article 11.
- American Convention on Human Rights – Article 15.
Kundin tsarin mulkin kasa da na yanki da suka amince da ‘yancin yin taro sun hada da:
Manazarta
gyara sashe- ↑ California Vehicle Code § 21950(b): "No pedestrian may unnecessarily stop or delay traffic while in a marked or unmarked crosswalk."
- ↑ Jeremy McBride, Freedom of Association, in The Essentials of... Human Rights, Hodder Arnold, London, 2005, pp. 18–20
- ↑ See: NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 898 (1982); Healey v. James, 408 U.S. 169 (1972); Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 1 (1964); United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Assn., 389 U.S. 217 (1967).
Mahada
gyara sashe- California Vehicle Code § 21950(b): "No pedestrian may unnecessarily stop or delay traffic while in a marked or unmarked crosswalk."
- ^ Jeremy McBride, Freedom of Association, in The Essentials of... Human Rights, Hodder Arnold, London, 2005, pp. 18–20
- ^ See: NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 898 (1982); Healey v. James, 408 U.S. 169 (1972); Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia, 377 U.S. 1 (1964); United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Assn., 389 U.S. 217 (1967).